I have noticed vast differences in how different individuals define the term “accountability” so its not surprising that different generations might approach accountability from very different perspectives. The older generations had no better handle on accountability than Millennials, so most executives are dissatisfied (and have been for generations) with strategy execution and the level of achievement in their organization. Accountability continues to be a core problem in organizations and is sometimes blamed on generational differences.
In my generation, accountability was seen as doing exactly as the boss instructs. When things didn’t work as expected, the boss researched the problem and gave more detailed instructions. The tone of clarifying instructions was direct and sometimes loud. Today’s employee expects more, and quite frankly have more on their plate. Rapid change, global competition, and endless threat/opportunities from new technologies requires stronger participation in problem-solving or even problem-solving without management involvement.
Employees must solve problems associated with their role, and managers no longer need to act like drill-sergeants. In fact managing like a drill-sergeant undermines real accountability if the organization is designed appropriately for the complex and fast changing world faced by today’s organizations. Today’s organizations need creative problem solving and rapid execution at every level of the structure. In addition, employees expect to be challenged in their work and want to be part of something greater than themselves. Managers are charged with delivering on this promise by setting consistent and challenging expectations of everyone in the organization.
Managers today should define accountability through their actions in the following ways:
If you feel stuck in the last century’s definition of accountability, let’s chat about how you might refine your accountability methods to be more effective.
Comments are closed